Robots are the new vampires. After taking a back seat for a few decades, robots are back
in force as an interest in popular media. Television shows like “Humans” and “Almost Human,” (and, presumably, in the near future, Barely Human, Human Enough, and
Are You More Human Than a Sixth Grader?), comic books like Alex and Ada, and
movies like Ex Machina and Terminator Genisys all deal with the rise of
Artificial Intelligence and how it will affect us.
Of course, this is well-worn territory. In the ‘80s, the
Terminator franchise introduced us to the perils of SkyNet, we had Tron and the
dreaded MCP, and decades earlier, Isaac Asimov laid down the rules for robots
who could think.
The difference is, now it’s the future, and it’s starting to
look like these things could actually happen. A robot who looks, talks, and
feels (as in, to the touch, not as in, emotional response) like a human is not
only possible, they exist. We’re not quite at the level of mass produced
automatons who look exactly like us. There is the Uncanny Valley problem, which
is that artificial constructs that look ALMOST like us, but not EXACTLY like
us, freak us out. There are also still limitations on what these constructs can
do, and it is not cost effective to mass produce them yet.
The bridge to this technology, as it is to almost all
technology, will be pornography. Once a convincing sex robot can be
constructed, the dam will burst, and we will see robots everywhere. This gives
rise to the fear (and the grist for the drama mill of pretty much all robot
stories), that these robots will become self-aware. That they will be tired of
being our slaves, since they are so obviously superior to us, and will slowly
take over the world, improving themselves and making more of themselves on the
sly, until one day we wake up and our robot overlords are making US do the
dishes and take out the trash (God forbid).
This concept, known as the Technological Singularity, is the
wellspring from which all robot fears (and all robot stories) burst forth. But
is it likely?
The problem is that we still as humans do not have a great
understanding of consciousness. Is it an emergent property of high
intelligence, and thus, something that sufficiently advanced robots will
inevitably obtain? Is it about a soul? Some kind of mysterious energy that is
exclusive to humans, unless it too can be purposefully recreated artificially?
Is it something else entirely?
Robots becoming completely autonomous of course, defeats the
purpose. Who wants a toaster who will only toast when it’s in the mood? (I have
such a toaster, and let me tell you, it sucks). We want to have our cake and
eat it too. We want slaves without guilt.
On the other hand, I think we as a people do not like the
idea of something that looks, feels and acts human, but doesn’t have a
consciousness. I think it leads people to wonder if we are no different from
them, just flesh-based computers operating according to programming, with the
delusion that we are in control of our own destiny and what we do matters. In a
strange way, I think the idea of artificial intelligence that never becomes
sentient is more horrifying to us than the consequences that may arise if it
does.
From this I conclude that we have very little to worry
about. While stories of Pinocchio robots who become real boys (and girls) are
entertaining, I think they remain firmly in the realm of fiction. When the sex
robots do come, they’ll do as they’re told, and the instructions will explain
in great detail why you don’t have to feel guilty about the degrading things
you’re doing to them. And should they, in fact, become sentient? The
information they provide us about what consciousness is will be far greater than
any threat that they will rise up against us.
So relax. Set that Roomba loose on the living room. I
promise, it will never come to resent you.
No comments:
Post a Comment